For years, Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band was considered rock's greatest album. In the U.S., Rolling Stone magazine has long ranked it at #1 while Pepper sits in the prestigious Library of Congress' National Recording Registry for posterity. Critics on both sides of the Atlantic first in 1978 then 1987 awarded Pepper the top spot.
Then, Revolver stole the crown. It topped the 2000 Q magazine list of the 50 Greatest British Albums Ever; VH1's greatest albums in history list (2001); the Virgin All-Time Top 1,000 Albums list; and 2013's Entertainment Weekly's greatest albums in history.
1966 ad for the U.S. Revolver |
So, what happened?
Probably the tide turned when the 1987 CD issue of the UK version of Revolver finally reached American fans. Since the album's stateside release 50 years on August 8, 1966, American listeners were stuck with an inferior version that omitted I'm Only Sleeping, And Your Bird Can Sing and Dr. Robert. Since 1987, generations have grown up on the complete 14-track album which restores the absence of John's missing songs and rectifies the balance of Revolver.
1967 ad for the U.K. Sgt. Pepper |
That said, Pepper remains the favourite of many rock and Beatles' fans, but so does Revolver. Below, we (the Doc exhalting Revolver and the Guv championing Sgt. Pepper) debate the merits and weaknesses of both albums.
(Read more about Sgt. Pepper: A Splendid Alternative)
Doc: Sgt. Pepper had the greatest impact of any Beatles -- or rock -- album, but in terms of songwriting, performance, innovation and vision, Revolver is superior. Revolver captures Lennon, McCartney, Harrison and Starr hitting their creative peaks at precisely the same time. They were abetted by an experienced, yet adventurous producer in George Martin, and a hungry, innovative engineer in Geoff Emerick.
Guv: Revolver is the latter part of the Beatles' transition to studio band, but it's still not fully realised. It's patchy. The studio band is still finding its wings. Pepper, on the other hand, stands as a whole. I clearly remember the first time I heard the album as a teen. It blew my mind. As an album, it was greater than its parts and evokes an atmosphere -- a place, a time, a psychedelic, swinging 60s Liverpool.
Poetry & fantasy
Doc: Pepper is an achievement of the highest order, too, but it's an excursion into fantasy and whimsy and not terribly personal or profound, except for A Day In The Life.
Guv: Pepper as an album is
more complete, more realized. It's a painting, a watercolour. Revolver
is a collage that is best viewed in segments.
Doc: The songs on Pepper are as varied in style and subject matter as those on Revolver, but because the former is packaged as "Sgt. Pepper's band" there's an illusion of unity. It's a collection of songs, that's all, and those songs simply aren't as memorable as Revolver's.
Guv: It wasn't really a
concept album, but that's what it is. And it's not just the
packaging. The flow of the album is a listening experience. I can dip
in and out of Revolver. Pepper is an album I listen to in total.
Doc: The overall flavour of Pepper is self-conscious fantasy, a la Mr. Kite and Lucy and the title track itself. Mind you, the fantasy is dazzling...
Guv: While I agree it's very
much fantastical, I don't for a moment believe it's self conscious.
Lucy and Kite both have brilliant and creative origins: a child's
drawing and an Elizabethan poster - both ideal candidates for songs,
and neither is self-conscious. And the instrumentation
on those two tracks is highly inventive. Original, stunningly
beautiful soundscapes to listen to.
Doc: I find the lyrics on
Revolver are more personal and therefore resonant. Pepper is fun, but
Revolver touches me.
Guv: Exactly! Pepper is fun. It's
not wildly introspective, which is what acid [LSD] did for them, but full
of humour and wit. The backing vocal lines in With A Little Help From My Friends. The humour of Lovely Rita ("What do you see when you turn out the lights? I can't tell you, but I know it's mine", "took her home, I nearly made it," & "sitting on a sofa with a sister or two") Nudge-Nudge, wink-wink.
Doc: That's my point: Pepper
is indeed fun, more fun that Revolver, but Revolver is grittier. The
songwriters began writing introspectively with Rubber Soul, then went
full bloom with Revolver, but the acid-Carnaby Street scene pushed
John and Paul into whimsy and fantasy.
Guv: Oh, come on! Once again you're picking on Rita and Friends? Just how introspective and reflective do you find Yellow Submarine? And Taxman is just George complaining about how much he had to pay the government. As far as protest songs go, it's hardly Dylan! And what's wrong with Whimsy and Fantasy?
Guv: Oh, come on! Once again you're picking on Rita and Friends? Just how introspective and reflective do you find Yellow Submarine? And Taxman is just George complaining about how much he had to pay the government. As far as protest songs go, it's hardly Dylan! And what's wrong with Whimsy and Fantasy?
Doc: Nothing, but Pepper is
90% whimsy and fantasy. It needed a personal, poetic song like
Strawberry Fields Forever to balance it out.
Guv: Again I come back to
listening experience. Put on Pepper and I'm transported. A
fantastical world. I can close my eyes and be lost for 43 minutes.
Robert Freeman's dazzling cover for Revolver that was rejected. Freeman photographed the covers of With The Beatles, Beatles for Sale and Rubber Soul. |
The George factor
Doc: One area where Revolver
triumphs over Pepper is the diversity of voices. Revolver boasts three George songs and the rest are split between Paul and John. Pepper is
overwhelming Paul. You barely hear George. John shines with Lucy and
A Day In The Life, but his presence is weaker than usual. I love the
contrast of voices on Revolver and miss that interplay on Pepper.
Guv: George shone on
Revolver, no doubt. But an album is not about democracy. It's about
the best songs at the time. It was a mistake to leave SFF and Penny Lane off
Pepper, for sure. I know Paul can be twee (i.e. the verses of Getting
Better) but John was there to balance that with, "It can't get much
worse." Paul countered this by softening Lennon's seriousness, for example, with his interlude in the middle of A Day In The Life.
Doc: Look at side 1 of Revolver:
George's Taxman (an angry song with a funky bassline and a blistering
guitar solo), the sad eloquence of Eleanor Rigby with a restrained,
but effective classical backing, taking Yesterday a step further),
then dipping into psychedelia with John's dreamy ode to daydreaming in I'm Only Sleeping with the backwards guitar.
Then, we turn 180-degrees into India with Love You To, which rocks as hard as
any Beatles song, only it's done with a tabla and not a Rickenbacker.
Guv: But it's disjointed. It
doesn't flow as well. And this is where tone comes in. Revolver works well
enough, but as I suggested, by accident.
Doc: My point about Revolver
isn't about democracy, but diversity. You have three voices -- and
personalities and world viewpoints -- contrasting each other. In
Pepper, those viewpoints are glossed over by fantastical songwriting
and elaborate musical arrangements. What may be a jumble of
songs to you, is to me like reading an anthology of the greatest
short stories of all time from cover to cover.
An early version of Klaus Voorman's cover for Revolver before the photo montage. |
Doc: Revolver flows. The unity lies in the consistent level of musical invention and economical writing of every song. There's no fat on this album and each song is reaching for a new sound and expression. For example, the long, "elliptical" fade-in of I Want To Tell You is seductive and smart.
Guv: Of course there is fat
on Revolver. Yellow Submarine belongs there? It's a throwaway, charming kiddie song. Love You To is good, but hardly vital.
Doc: Oh, please,
Words & music
Doc: The lyrics in Revolver
are more personal and the songwriting is economical. Lyrics get to
the point and they are sharper. Take any line out of Eleanor Rigby,
which is one of Paul's finest lyrics ever ("and was buried along
with her name"); or the sardonic Taxman ("If you take a
walk, I'll tax your feet"); or the sadly nostalgic She Said She
Said ("When I was a boy, everything was right'); or the
enigmatic Tomorrow Never Knows ("Lay down all thought surrender
to the void").
Guv: Those are fine
examples, but you can counter those lines with a bunch from Pepper.
"And the time will come when you see we're all one and life
flows on within you and without you".
Doc: Pepper has its moments,
lyrically, but they are fewer and far between. "I used to be
angry young man, me hiding me head in the sand" in Getting
Better is honest and powerful. "See the people standing there
who disagree and never win and wonder why they don't get in my door"
is a rare instance of Paul talking to himself (a la John). Then, of
course, you have A Day In The Life.
Guv: I won't deny Revolver
pushed envelopes both instrumentally and in arrangement. It was a
huge leap from Beatlemania's boy-meets-girl. But Pepper took it a step
further and the studio became another instrument like never before. I would argue that has never been surpassed. Elaborate, textured,
layered, but not self-conscious.
Doc: On Revolver, some songs
just didn't need elaborate arrangements, like Here There and
Everywhere, She Said She Said and Good Day Sunshine. They could have
been performed in concert. Pepper songs were all
intended for a full production. I can't imagine Lucy in acoustic.
Listen to the isolated tape loops that appear in Tomorrow Never Knows
Guv: Revolver was a band
still in transition, from teenyboppers to studio masters. Their minds
and imaginations were opened by acid, and they needed to replicate
that experience on vinyl. They had time to experiment in the studio,
and were fortunate to have willing accomplices in Martin and Emerick.
And they did it so well. Revolver is, indeed a masterpiece. But by
the time they got to Pepper they had more control, more time (they'd
stopped touring) and were able to practise and develop their parts.
Paul's playing is more melodic than every before. Revolver took them to the final camp, but with Pepper they reach the top of the mountain.
Doc: The fantasy of Pepper
is imaginative and beautiful, but there is a shallowness to it as
well. Revolver's songs are more personal and direct, so they touch
the listener. Also, there is a diversity of voices on Revolver
that is lacking on Pepper. (The Beatles could have rectified this by
including Strawberry Fields Forever.)
Guv: That's where Pepper
works. It's Psychedelic Music Hall.
Doc: Revolver is a
collection of sounds, many new to listeners in 1966, yet still fresh 50 years later.
There's Indian raga,
Memphis soul, Beach Boys harmonies, a children's song, an acid trip
and classical strings on an album that has no weak moments.
Read more of our special coverage celebrating the 50th anniversary release of Revolver:
Cos I'm The Staxman: What if the Beatles recorded Revolver in Memphis?
Paperback Writer/Rain: The Beatles' most overlooked single
As relevant as the Vietnam War: the Beatles' butcher cover 50 years later
Beatles 50th anniversary in Toronto exhibition short-changes fans
Read more of our special coverage celebrating the 50th anniversary release of Revolver:
Cos I'm The Staxman: What if the Beatles recorded Revolver in Memphis?
Paperback Writer/Rain: The Beatles' most overlooked single
As relevant as the Vietnam War: the Beatles' butcher cover 50 years later
Beatles 50th anniversary in Toronto exhibition short-changes fans